Harmony Immigration Consultancy
Business Services in Melbourne
Address365, Little Collins Street St. Melbourne. Melbourne, VIC, 3000.
Are you the owner or manager of this company?
What you should know about Harmony Immigration Consultancy
Most of our concern visa clients are international students and tourists who fear to return to their home country and would like to stay in Australia permanently. Below is some information on how the appeals process works. When appealing to the AA, a fresh decision is made on the facts of your case. You could apply for Ministerial Intervention behind merits review if you think that there are compelling grounds for grant of a visa, even though you do not confront the ordinary visa requirements. It is not considered to be a real risk that a person will suffer significant impair if: Sponsorship Applying for approval as a business sponsor would require the business to produce details to show: Accepting the requirements for approval as a business sponsor. There is a variety of Australian business visas that business people can obtain for themselves or their employees, including: Peace Immigration has significant expertise in obtaining ENS visas for employers, in some cases where the case does not confront the standard criteria. This will precede to significantly faster processing than lodging directly with the Department of Immigration. Nomination: review of the business and position by the Department of Immigration. The main difficulties employers face when obtaining isms visas are as follows: If you have been in the relationship with your partner for three years or more at the time of application or. A Be fact relationship would require evidence that you have lived with your partner for the last 12 months. Having regard to the all the evidence, the tribunal was satisfied that at the time of application, the couple had a mutual commitment to a shared life to the exclusion of all others, as healthy as a sincere and continuing relationship. The applicants provided to the department limited evidence of their relationship. The applicant and the sponsor further claimed that they were married in 2013 when the sponsor turned 18. The tribunal found that at the time of application and the time of decision, the parties were in a spousal relationship. The tribunal found that the evidence of the sponsor was at times contradictory, such as whether or not the applicant had discussed with the sponsor that he had given up his employment and what humane of work he would do in Australia if the visa was granted. The tribunal found that the sponsor and the applicant were married prior the delegate had refused the visa. The tribunal suggested to the sponsor that he give evidence to support his claims relating to his ongoing and sincere spousal relationship with the applicant to the department for consideration of any other visa applications. Furthermore, the parties themselves had given evidence that they were in a sincere relationship. Given the inconsistent evidence, the tribunal was not prepared to trust the parties evidence at face value about their commitment to the relationship. We regularly get calls from people who lodge the application themselves and are facing major issues.